On Obama's Many Promises to Stop Iran's Nuclear Program - Jeffrey Goldberg - International - The Atlantic

On Obama's Many Promises to Stop Iran's Nuclear Program - Jeffrey Goldberg - International - The Atlantic: "NOV 29 2011, 9:11 AM ET
President Obama, who has been maligned in every possible way on the topic of Israel and its security, continues to affirm his commitment to stopping Iran's nuclear program. Not that you would notice from the coverage. I've believed, since I reported this Atlantic story last year, that Obama is quite serious about keeping nuclear weapons out of Iran's hands.

Earlier this month, following the damning IAEA report on the progress of Iran's nuclear program, Obama spoke of marshaling an international front that "makes clear to Iran this is unacceptable." "

Above NewsFlash Courtesy of: TheAtlantic.com



Editors Pictorial:

Lets see, what sort of clarity does a Nation like Iran require:

Yes, that might get their attention.


'via Blog this'

Rebuzz.org- More Than A Facebook Archive!: Stephen Sanders

Rebuzz.org- More Than A Facebook Archive!: Stephen Sanders: "Stephen Sanders
Stephen Sanders: "Welcome -- and thank you for visiting my Web site! I hope you find it informative. As a founding member of Team Sanders, I study the real estate market daily. When you have a question about the Northern Kentucky Real Estate Market, please contact me. Best regards!""

'via Blog this'

Switzerland widens scope of Iran sanctions - Israel News, Ynetnews

Switzerland widens scope of Iran sanctions - Israel News, Ynetnews: "Switzerland has added 116 names to its list of Iranian entities under sanctions, in response to heightened international concern about Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

The 35-nation board of the UN nuclear watchdog looked set on Friday to censure Iran over mounting suspicions it is seeking to develop atom bombs. (Reuters)"

'via Blog this'

UN report: Iran IS trying to build nuclear bomb warns William Hague | Mail Online

UN report: Iran IS trying to build nuclear bomb warns William Hague | Mail Online: "International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran is developing a nuclear test facility, nuclear detonators and computer modelling for a nuclear warhead that would fit on an existing missile.

Sources say the understanding at the top of the British Government is that Israel will attempt to strike against the nuclear sites ‘sooner rather than later’ – with logistical support from the U.S.

A senior Foreign Office figure has revealed that ministers have been told to expect Israeli military action,"

'via Blog this'

The Essence of this Website is it's One Message.

Creating a world that is safer for us all, requires careful thinking planning and building upon a stable foundation. As peace loving citizens of the world we must unite i a simple, logical and un-mistakable remedy which must be utilized so that the world of the future is a safer place for children and other living things. G-d has gifted us all with beautiful and sophisticated minds. All we must do, is change the way we use them. 


Citizens of the world must unite. We will not tolerate a Nuclear Capable Iran. The enlightened person intuitively and factually understands the future implications of a nation like Iran possessing nuclear weaponry is a too much of a major shift in a very delicate power shift. We who can express our views, vote our conscience and especially those who currently serve as our duly elected or paid officials are sworn to protect the US against our enemies, be they foreign or domestic, who is this case are also the enemy of any peace loving citizen of the world.

Do you like this picture, our client at Being Developed has kindly allowed us to us this image with no specific sharing requirements other than the following: 


We kindly request that the entire photo as shown, be used (not cropped). That you do not take credit for this picture, but rather would kindly share a link to the enterprise most closely associated with its development:


SocialAdvertising.org


Just as these tiny colorful building blocks spell out a simple message, so do the current actions that are taking place in the one world where we all live.


During these fast paced and rapidly developing times, we need to build a solid foundation where the world where our children and grandchildren live will be a safer, kinder, healthier, more economically sound, and safer world.


These goals are reasonable and achievable and obtainable however there are some wild cards which are currently in play which break our world so badly where it would simply be irreparable. All the other lofty political and economic goals being so hotly debated pales by comparison. The only world truly worth living in, is a world that is safer than the world we live in today.


Please comment the opinions of our diverse network is important to this web developer. Thank you.


Stephen C. Sanders
TheWritersCafe.org
SocialTropism/truth-seeking
SanCloud9
SocialAdvertising.org/ads/low-cost
Keep Your Friends Close
Spirituality-Religions-Final-Frontier?

Where's The Beef?

Where's The Beef?: "A scientist who pays attention not to the public statements, but to the record of past United States behaviors towards Iran and Israel, will have to be surprised if the US attacks Iran.

Naturally, a scientist must predict what she expects, not what would surprise her, so the scientific prediction here is that the US will not attack Iran."

'via Blog this'

White House says IAEA report on Iran 'very alarming'

White House says IAEA report on Iran 'very alarming': "The White House said on Thursday that this week's International Atomic Energy Agency report on Iran's nuclear program was "very alarming" and said it would continue to pressure Tehran to "change its behavior."

"They need to get right with the world and live up to their obligations with regards to their nuclear program. We will continue to pursue that going forward in the wake of this very alarming report," White House spokesman Jay Carney said."

'via Blog this'

EU mulls new sanctions against defiant Iran

EU mulls new sanctions against defiant Iran: "Tehran says it needs the fuel to make isotopes for cancer treatment.

A leading Israeli investment firm said on Thursday any military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities would exact an economic price too high for the world to accept.

A oil price surge, the costs of war and damage to global trade would be too great and would deter world powers from serious action, said Amir Kahanovich, chief economist at Clal Finance, one of Israel's largest brokerage houses."

'via Blog this'

Russia 'ready to build new reactors' in Iran

Russia 'ready to build new reactors' in Iran: "Russia is ready to build more nuclear reactors in Iran, its nuclear chief Sergei Kiriyenko said Thursday despite renewed fears that Tehran is seeking to produce nuclear weapons.

"We are looking into it, we have the orders, so we are working this proposal through, since building specifically nuclear reactors is not an issue of doubt in the international community," said Kiriyenko, who heads the Rosatom state corporation.

"It's not related to sensitive issues, so it is entirely possible," Kiriyenko told a government meeting, noting that Iran has expressed a desire to continue building nuclear reactors.

His comments came as Western governments renewed pressure on the Islamic republic over its nuclear programme after the UN's nuclear watchdog published an report pointing to evidence that Iran was making nuclear missile warheads."

'via Blog this'

Israel, Peace at What Price?

Israel, Peace at What Price?: "Earthquake Means Hashem Expects Us To Work More Efficiently? | ChaiDomains.com: " If this Website can garner about between 10-36 people who are willing to contribute some of their time, money, or ingenuity, or otherwise support some of the nobler intentions of this small family of websites, then you will be able to see the entire plan unfold before your eyes.
Without the Holy Temple and a unified Israel, or the greatly anticipated arrival of Moshiach speedily in our day, we can only interpret the various clue"

'via Blog this'

Social Ad Cloud: Social Tropism: Intelligent Use Of Resources-Better Than Endlessly Tweaking What Is Failing! « TheWritersCafe.org

Social Ad Cloud: Social Tropism: Intelligent Use Of Resources-Better Than Endlessly Tweaking What Is Failing! « TheWritersCafe.org: "Social Tropism: Intelligent Use Of Resources-Better Than Endlessly Tweaking What Is Failing! « TheWritersCafe.org
Social Tropism: Intelligent Use Of Resources-Better Than Endlessly Tweaking What Is Failing! « TheWritersCafe.org: "Social Tropism
As a plant slowly an imperceptibly moves towards the light, so does society move towards what our social leaders follow. Media has now become more social than anything else, therefore what "most people believe' has become the new gold standard backdrop, to the true facts of matter at hand.-AhMbDvd-6/17/11 8:50am""

'via Blog this'

Social Tropism

Social Tropism: "Social Tropism
As a plant slowly an imperceptibly moves towards the light, so does society move towards what our social leaders follow. Media has now become more social than anything else, therefore what "most people believe' has become the new gold standard backdrop"

'via Blog this'

TheWritersCafe.org

TheWritersCafe.org: "we strike the aravat against the floor on Hoshana Rabbah we can do our best to tear down the wall which we ourselves have constructed. That way when can hope to rebuild the original path whereby G-d can once again share the great abundance that exists in the world both for ourselves as individuals, as "

'via Blog this'

Ron Paul denies third-party run. So why are pundits still talking about it? - CSMonitor.com

Ron Paul denies third-party run. So why are pundits still talking about it? - CSMonitor.com: "Paul, despite his straw poll wins, continues to poll in the single digits (behind Herman Cain, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Perry) in national surveys of likely voters, and it's unlikely a third-party run, even if he did choose that, would garner significant support.

But it could certainly be a factor in the overall election, much like Ross Perot's run was in 1992.

Moreover, Paul has been reluctant to support other Republican candidates. In that same Fox interview, Paul said he would "probably not" give his support to a GOP candidate unless that candidate agreed with most of his positions (highly unlikely, given Paul's stances on everything from the Federal Reserve and defense spending to foreign affairs and aid to Israel)."

'via Blog this'

Ron Paul in Iowa debate: Iran should be allowed to develop nuclear bomb « Wintery Knight

Ron Paul in Iowa debate: Iran should be allowed to develop nuclear bomb « Wintery Knight: "Tehran’s navy deploys ships to the Atlantic capable of launching long-range missiles. This is not a joke. This is a dress rehearsal for the day an EMP attack ends our way of life.

‘Is it possible for us to witness a world without America and Zionism?” Iran’s Mahmoud Ahmadinejad asked at “The World Without Zionism” Tehran conference in 2005. “But you had best know that this slogan and this goal are attainable, and surely can be achieved.” He added that Iran had a “war preparation plan” for, as he put it, “the destruction of Anglo-Saxon civilization.”

Electromagnetic pulse, or EMP, is not a subject familiar to most Americans. But it’s quite familiar to the Iranian military."

'via Blog this'

Who Really Believes The US, Should Just Mind Their Own Business?

GOP Contenders Spar Over Iranian Nuclear Ambitions | Neon Tommy

GOP Contenders Spar Over Iranian Nuclear Ambitions | Neon Tommy: "In a heated response Santorum called out Paul, suggesting the GOP hopeful is "obviously not seeing the world very clearly."

Santorum said Iran "must be confronted," describing the government as "a mullahcracy that tramples the rights of women, tramples the rights of gays, tramples the rights of people all throughout their society – and is the greatest supporter of terrorism in the Middle East and around the world."

Paul rejoined that Santorum was churning out war propaganda.

"You’ve heard the war propaganda that is liable to lead us into the sixth war, and I worry about that position," said Paul.

The other candidates participating in the debate, including Mitt Romney, the frontrunner according to polls, have identified a nuclear Iran as a threat to U.S. security."

'via Blog this'

Ron Paul denies third-party run. So why are pundits still talking about it? - CSMonitor.com

Ron Paul denies third-party run. So why are pundits still talking about it? - CSMonitor.com: "The GOP presidential candidate – who has deeply loyal supporters – has nixed the idea at least twice. So why are pundits still talking about it?

Most recently, Representative Paul was asked on a "Fox News Sunday" interview whether he would consider an independent run. He replied, “I have no intention of doing that. That doesn't make sense to me to even think about it, let alone plan to do that.”

IN PICTURES: Ron Paul – populist for president

That's almost identical to an answer he gave CNN several days ago."

'via Blog this'

TheWritersCafe.org

TheWritersCafe.org: "The problem of course at least in this country, The United States, is that the majority of our supposedly enlightened population still stubbornly adhere to the dogma that gets created by their political leaders. Even though technological advances could at least in theory mitigate some of the actual monetary losses suffered throughout the world.

Now naturally I realize I said quite a mouthful and believe I have every intention to back up what I have said. The problem is that in my mind the process is a bit tedious. It would require me having to go back and provide exact quotes from lets say one of the leading Republican candidates who had the audacity to actually state that he believes Iran should be allowed to develop nuclear weapons!"

'via Blog this'

[FREE $17 WSO!] - "THESE TWO SEO SECRETS WILL PULL THOUSANDS OF VISITORS TO YOUR SITE 24/7!"

[FREE $17 WSO!] - "THESE TWO SEO SECRETS WILL PULL THOUSANDS OF VISITORS TO YOUR SITE 24/7!": "As many of you know Google has recently dropped yet another dreaded update. The reason: to get rid of all the poor content and spammy sites. This update wiped out many sites and people are scratching their heads wondering what to do now and more importantly how to avoid this in the future?

I felt compelled to make this report to set the record straight as there has been so much misinformation “already” published on this topic.


Truth Be Told - I Could Careless About Google’s Updates…
"

'via Blog this'